Most of my theories and stories aren't that far off of most speculations made by Zelda fans, in fact some of them are inspired by those theories. I probably won't elaborate on why certain things are the way that they are in my stories and theories, because that can be theorized by you. Generally the story that goes with a common theory can be analyzed and make sense because of other stories I made up, or because of factual things from Zelda itself. I understand that I may make some mistakes, that contradict main Zelda things that are confirmed, and if I do, I encourage you to comment on them and I will look into it and change it if I see fit. Now take this into consideration if you tell me that something in my theories and stories can't be true, that the series of Zelda contradicts itself all the time, whether it be because the creators changed their minds or something of the sort, but it does happen. Finally, I know that there are many errors in English grammar and spelling in my articles, but they are meant to be bullet points of sorts, and I am not that good at writing in a proper manor.
1. The Picori Blade is almost definitly NOT the Master Sword. The Master Sword has never been able to transform one person into four. The Picori did not create the Master Sword, but the Goddess Hylia and Link forged the Goddess Sword into the Master Sword. The only possible way that the Master Sword could be related to the Picori Blade (the Four Sword) is if the Picori forged the Master sword into the Picori Blade. If this is true, then the "official" Zelda timeline is completely wrong (which I suspect it is anyways).
2. The Tempered Sword is also NOT the Master Sword. It is actually a tempered version of the Fighter's Sword. They look exactly the same except for color of the handle and blade (the Fighter's Sword is the Sword in the A Link to the Past logo). Why would the Master Sword look like crap after the Swordsmiths worked on it but yet it preforms better? It would make more sense to temper the Fighter's Sword. Also, regular swordsmiths could never forge or mess with such a powerful and sacred blade as the Master Sword. Therefore, the Fighter's Sword was upgraded by 4x and not the Master Sword by 2x. The sword that Link puts back the blue Master Sword into the pedastal at the end of A Link to the Past and not a red "Master Sword." Link also didn't need the Master Sword to beat Ganon in the original The Legend of Zelda, so that is why he can use the Tempered Sword to beat Ganon.
3. The Golden Sword is also NOT the Master Sword. It looks entirely different from the Master Sword. Also, a lowly fat fairy could never temper or completly change a Sword made by Goddesses. You may say that the Master Sword was upgraded by the sols in Twilight Princess, but if you listen to the conversation between Midna and Link, a Goddess actual infuses the Master Sword with the Sols. It is actually a tempered version of the Tempered Sword or Fighter's Sword (since she can turn the Fighter's Sword into the Tempered Sword or the Tempered Sword into the Golden Sword. You can also give the Tempered Sword to the swordsmiths if you had the Fairy upgrade the Fighter's Sword and they will upgrade it to the Golden Sword). Also, regular swordsmiths could never forge or mess with such a powerful and sacred blade as the Master Sword. Therefore, the Fighter's Sword was upgraded by 8x and not the Master Sword by 4x. The sword that Link puts back the blue Master Sword into the pedastal at the end of A Link to the Past and not a golden "Master Sword." Link also didn't need the Master Sword to beat Ganon in the original The Legend of Zelda, so that is why he can use the Golden Sword to beat Ganon.
4. "Official" Timeline Rant Part 1: A Link to the Past and Four Swords Adventures have to be placed in the same section of the timeline. There would be no Dark World in the Child Timeline if the Imprisoning War didn't happen before or just before Four Swords Adventures. According to the "Official" Timeline, the two games and the war occur on different parts of the timeline.
5. "Official" Timeline Rant Part 2: If we are led to believe that Link can cannonically be defeated in any version of The Legend of Zelda, then the timeline is therefore in itself false. This would not be possible because he actually won in the Adult and Child timelines. Also this would make it possible for Link to lose in the battle with Demise, and Demise could take over the entire world. After Demise did this, he would probably be able to find a way to destroy all versions of the Timeline besides the one he is in. There is no way that the creators would allow this!!!
6.
No comments:
Post a Comment